Triarchy Press
use code tpdirect at checkout for a 20% discount
  • SUBJECTS
  • ABOUT US
    • Systems thinking
    • Whatever Next?
    • Systems Thinking Glossary
    • AMED
  • BOOKSHOP
    • New Titles and Bestsellers
    • Delivery charges
    • Gift ideas
    • eBooks
    • Book Sellers
    • Inspection Copies
    • Recommend to Library
    • Non-UK Customers
  • BUSINESS AUDITS
  • AUTHORS
    • Author Information >
      • Royalties
  • THANK YOU
  • BASKET
  • CONTACT US
  • PERMISSIONS

The Whitehall Effect ~ John Seddon - Online Notes

Links below take you to the chapter notes:


Introduction
1. Prelude

Part 1: The industrialisation of public services
2: Call centres
3. Back Offices
4. Shared Services
5. Outsourcing
6. Information Technology

Part 2: Delivering services that work
Introduction
7. A better philosophy
8. Effective change starts with ‘study’
9. Better thinking, better design
10. ‘Locality’ working
11. IT as pull, not push

Part 3: Things that make your head hurt
12. Targets and standards make performance worse
13. Inspection can’t improve performance
14. Regulation is a disease
15. It’s the system, not the people
16. Incentives always get you less

Part 4: ideology, fashions and fads 
17. Choice
18. Personal Budgets
19. Commissioning
20. Managing demand
21. Nudge
22. Procurement
23. Risk management
24. Lean
25. IT: features over benefits

Part 5 Change must start in Whitehall
26. Beware economists bearing plausible ideas
27. Whitehall is  incapable of doing evidence
28. Getting a focus on purpose

Picture
6. Information Technology

1] Robin Gauld and Shaun Goldfinch, 2006, Dangerous Enthusiams: E-government, Computer Failure and Information System Development, Otago University Press.

2] Outcomes from IT investments: 80-90% do not meet their performance goals; 80% are late and over budget; 40% of developments fail or are abandoned; fewer than 25% integrate business and technology objectives; just 10-20% meet all their success criteria. See:, OASIG, Institute of Work Psychology, 1995, Failing to deliver: the IT performance gap, University of Sheffield.

3] House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, 5 July 2013, The dismantled National Programme for IT in the NHS, Nineteenth Report of Session 2013–14, p.21. View  

4] “Tim Donohoe, Senior Responsible Officer for Local Service Provider Programmes (LSPs), insisted that the NHS had ‘got a good deal for the taxpayer’… Donohoe said that the NHS couldn’t pull out of the contract all together on the basis of a breach – despite not fulfilling its terms – because it could have claimed things about how the NHS conducted itself and it was agreed that it was ‘not worth the risk of getting into further legal disputes’.”

Quoted in Computerworld UK, 12 June 2013, ‘NHS still set to spend £600m with “rotten” CSC on “hopeless” NPfIT systems’. Byline: Derek du Preez. View   

5] House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, 24 June 2013, FiReControl: Update report, Sixteenth Report of Session 2013-14. View 

6] House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee, 5 June 2006, Fire and Rescue Service: Fourth Report of Session 2005–06 Volume I.  View

House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee, 16 March 2010, FiReControl: Fifth Report of Session 2009–10.  View

7] Computerworld UK, 23 July 13, ‘MPs attack rescue plan for £482 million FireControl project’. Byline: Matthew Finnegan.  View
  
8] Dexter Whitfield, 2007 ‘Cost overruns, delays and terminations: 105 outsourced public sector ICT projects’ ESSU Research Report No. 3. View 
 
9] View and View ‘Our net running costs in 2012–13, at £169m, were £5.1m higher than in 2011–12.’

10] House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, 14 November 2011, Rural Payments Agency - follow up to National Audit Office and Public accounts Committee Recommendations - corrected evidence Corrected transcript of Oral Evidence HC 1616-i’ Q167. View    

11] See a short animation about the Prince 2 project management methodology. Prince 2 leads to plenty of activity but little understanding and, hence, plenty of failure. View 

12] New Statesman, 19 February 2014, ‘Is Cameron now afraid to mention Universal Credit?’ Byline: George Eaton. View  

13] Campaign4Change, 12 March 2014, ‘Another DWP leader quits – is Universal Credit IT really working?’ Byline: Tony Collins. View  

14] The Guardian, 23 May 2014, ‘Watchdog now treating universal credit as 'new project' after successive delays’. Byline: Patrick Wintour. View  

15] John Seddon, ‘Dissolving a Dangerous Enthusiasm: Taking a Systems Approach to IT Systems’, Cutter IT journal Vol. 26, No. 4, April 2013. View  

16] The Independent, 10 March 2014, ‘Councils spend millions on controversial 'pseudo-science' lie-detector tests to help catch benefit frauds’. Byline: Ian Johnston. View   

17] Ibid.

18] “The group’s first priorities, with immediate effect, will be to: … implement an immediate freeze on all new ICT spend above £1 million; review the government’s biggest projects, including ICT projects, to see where costs can be reduced or wasteful projects stopped altogether; start renegotiating contracts with major suppliers across government to reduce costs”, from a gov.uk press release, 24 May 2010, ‘Cabinet Office and Treasury to join forces to drive out waste’. View